[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Dates
- To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,       Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,       Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
 
- Subject: Dates
 
- From: Rick Miller <cbmvax!uunet!DISCUS.MIL.WI.US!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!rick>
 
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1992 08:30:57 CST
 
- Reply-To: Rick Miller <cbmvax!uunet!DISCUS.MIL.WI.US!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!rick>
 
- Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!LOJBAN>
 
Edmund Grimley-Evans <uwm!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!RZ.UNI-SB.DE!dfkihueg> writes:
> If you write dates in the form 2002-03-04 then there is no danger of
> confusion (except for dates before 32 AD), because if you start with
> the year, you always follow it with the month. The form YYYY-MM-DD is
> already widely used in the Esperanto-speaking world...
I'll "second" this one... It only makes sense to stick with the standard
of putting the most significant figures first.  YYYY-MM-DD.hh:mm:ss.xxx...?
Non-lojban-related trailer follows...
So when do we start using 'metric' time (ie. deci-days, centi-days,
milli-days, etc.)?  Maybe it should be based on some other more standard
unit of time... 1 [(Terran) day] == 86.4 kilo-seconds???  Personally,
I'd go for the "day" unit, since it's tied to the human sleep-cycle.
Any ideas for a less arbitrary standard unit?  Just curious.
Richard (Rick) Miller, Room A516     DNS:  rick@discus.mil.wi.us
Wisconsin Electric Power Company     VOX:  +1 414 221 3403
333 West Everett Street              FAX:  +1 414 221 3779
Milwaukee, Wisconsin  53203  USA     My opinions are my own.