[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place

To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Subject: Re: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place
From: John Cowan <cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!cowan@UUNET.UU.NET>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 15:01:48 -0500
In-Reply-To: <9301271548.AA02753@relay1.UU.NET> from "Logical Language Group" at Jan 27, 93 10:43:11 am
Reply-To: John Cowan <cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!cowan@UUNET.UU.NET>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>

la lojbab. cusku di'e

> John Cowan just posted to the extent that "sle" was the rafsi for selci and
> not selfu.  This is incorrect, since the rafsi changes are not in place and
> published.  John (and perhaps others) are occasionally guilty of forgetting
> that not everyone has the latest in-development information.

This change was published in JL16, p. 11, and predates the rafsi review
process.  I didn't realize that until I went looking back through old
LogFlash gismu lists, or I would have responded differently.

--
John Cowan      cowan@snark.thyrsus.com         ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
                        e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

Prev by Date: TECH.ADV - non-specific SE
Next by Date: TECH: empathy in attitudinals (proposal)
Prev by thread: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place
Next by thread: RE: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread