Re: On the tense system of ZAhO

[Colin Fine <C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK>]

I concur with Jorge that Bob is making a specious distinction
in order to explain something that, on hindsight, was an
error.
ZAhO fit into imaginary journeys, but for historical reasons
two of them were given words with inappropriate etymologies.

It is true that they work differently from PU when used as sumti
tcita, but that is not a reason to run the imaginary journey the
wrong way.

        Colin