Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• lists of local area lojbanists, Logical Language Group
• Re: Problem perhaps, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Problem perhaps, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Problem perhaps, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Problem perhaps, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Problem perhaps, Matthew Faupel
  • Re: Problem perhaps, i.alexander.bra0125
  • Re: Problem perhaps, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Problem perhaps, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Problem perhaps, Nick NICHOLAS
• Back orders, announcement of le lojbo karni 18/19, Logical Language Group
• new subscribers - let us hear from you, Logical Language Group
• LogFest 94, Logical Language Group
• Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'. (fwd), Logical Language Group
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'. (fwd), Nick NICHOLAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'. (fwd), Logical Language Group
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'. (fwd), Nick NICHOLAS
    • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'. (fwd), Logical Language Group
• Re: a simple question..., Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: a simple question..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: a simple question..., Jorge Llambias
  • Re: a simple question..., Jorge Llambias
  • Re: a simple question..., Jorge Llambias
• New to Lojban, BobMichael
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: New to Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: New to Lojban, Nick NICHOLAS
    • Re: New to Lojban, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: New to Lojban, Logical Language Group
    • Re: New to Lojban, Nick NICHOLAS
• Re: cukta, Nick NICHOLAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: cukta, Logical Language Group
  • Re: cukta, Logical Language Group
  • Re: cukta, Logical Language Group
  • Re: cukta, Logical Language Group
  • Re: cukta, Logical Language Group
  • Re: cukta, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: cukta, SLAUGHTER
  • Re: cukta, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: cukta, ucleaar
  • Re: cukta, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: cukta, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: cukta, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: cukta, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: cukta, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: cukta, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: cukta, i.alexander.bra0125
  • cukta, Gerald Koenig
  • Re: cukta, Jorge Llambias
• I declare LogFest started!!!, Logical Language Group
• LogFest update, Logical Language Group
• Logfest and IRC, Logical Language Group
• Re: le mi jbomrilu .ui, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • le mi jbomrilu .ui, Chris Bogart
• Returned mail: User unknown, Mail Delivery Subsystem
• Re: Lojban phonology, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • lojban phonology, Philip Delaquess
  • Re: lojban phonology, jimc
• Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
    • Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Nick NICHOLAS
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Chris Bogart
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Chris Bogart
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Chris Bogart
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Chris Bogart
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, protin
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Chris Bogart
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, jimc
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, protin
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, jimc
    • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
    • Empathy (was: ciska bai tu'a zo bai), Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Chris Bogart
    • Re: ga'i[nai] (was: ciska bai tu'a zo bai), Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Colin Fine
    • Re: ga'i[nai] (was: ciska bai tu'a zo bai), Logical Language Group
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Colin Fine
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: ciska bai tu'a zo bai, Jorge Llambias
• New versions of reference grammar on line, Logical Language Group
• Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], SLAUGHTER
  • Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], Logical Language Group
  • Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], jimc
  • Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], Jorge Llambias
    • Re: ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], Logical Language Group
  • Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], Jorge Llambias
  • Re: ga'i[nai], ke'u[nai], va'i[nai], Nick NICHOLAS
• Re: lojban thesaurus query, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lojban thesaurus query, Logical Language Group
  • lojban thesaurus query, ucleaar
  • lojban thesaurus query, ucleaar
    • Re: lojban thesaurus query, Logical Language Group
  • Re: lojban thesaurus query, Jack Waugh
  • Re: lojban thesaurus query, Colin Fine
• Lojban as a Pedagogical Tool?, Logical Language Group
• lujvo files, Logical Language Group
• Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Logical Language Group
  • To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Logical Language Group
  • Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: To be or not to be? Coffee or tea?, Logical Language Group
• Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Randall Holmes
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Randall Holmes
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Logical Language Group
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Logical Language Group
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Randall Holmes
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Randall Holmes
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Randall Holmes
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Randall Holmes
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Jorge Llambias
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Randall Holmes
  • Re: Response to Randall Holmes on Loglan/Lojban "me", Jorge Llambias
• Holmes, etc., Kelly J. Salsbery
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Holmes, etc., Logical Language Group
• help wanted from the community, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: help wanted from the community, Glenn M. Forrest
  • Re: help wanted from the community, Logical Language Group
• to all recent subscribers, Logical Language Group
• Lojbanized German place names, Erik Rauch
  • Re: Lojbanized German place names, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Lojbanized German place names, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lojbanized German place names, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lojbanized German place names, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lojbanized German place names, ucleaar
  • Re: Lojbanized German place names, Nick NICHOLAS
  • Re: Lojbanized German place names, Erik Rauch
• Re: Object and Event, BobMichael
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Object and Event, Jack Waugh
  • Re: Object and Event, SLAUGHTER
  • Re: Object and Event, Colin Fine
• Re: US place names, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • US place names, Philip Delaquess
• Be proud of Goran Topic, Nick NICHOLAS
• Message from Colin FIne, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: Message from Colin FIne, Jorge Llambias
• Re: ga'i (was: ciska bai tu'a zo bai), Logical Language Group
• Re: ga'i[nai] (was: ciska bai tu'a zo bai), Logical Language Group
• Lojbanizing umlaut, Logical Language Group
• Re: current cmene project, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: current cmene project, Logical Language Group
    • Re: current cmene project, ucleaar
  • Re: current cmene project, Logical Language Group
    • Re: current cmene project, ucleaar
  • Re: current cmene project, Logical Language Group
  • Re: current cmene project, Logical Language Group
  • current cmene project, ucleaar
  • current cmene project, Chung-chieh Shan
  • Re: current cmene project, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: current cmene project, SLAUGHTER
  • Re: current cmene project, ucleaar
  • Re: current cmene project, ucleaar
• Re: sumti categories, Colin Fine
  • Re: sumti categories, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: sumti categories, Jorge Llambias
    • Re: sumti categories, Logical Language Group
  • Re: sumti categories, i.alexander.bra0125
  • Re: sumti categories, Colin Fine
• lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'., Nick NICHOLAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'., Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'., Philip Delaquess
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'., Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'., Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'., i.alexander.bra0125
  • Re: lenu mi siskytadni cu mulno/ rIn jIQulmeH Qu'., Jorge Llambias
• TECH: ma budjo su'u da tadni la lojban, Veijo Vilva
• Terseness (Re: New to Lojban), Matthew Faupel
• Re: ill-formed, Colin Fine
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ill-formed, Jorge Llambias
• Two corrections, Colin Fine
• Re: lojban writing and speaking rules, Colin Fine
  • Re: lojban writing and speaking rules, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: lojban writing and speaking rules, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: lojban writing and speaking rules, Colin Fine
• CAFE.TEXT: vi le ckafybarja, Jorge Llambias
• ga'i, Veijo Vilva
• Re: ga'i[nai], Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: ga'i[nai], ucleaar
• ga'i ga'inai, SLAUGHTER
• lojban word lists, Philip Delaquess
• Sources for Lojban placenames in local form, bhelm
• No Subject, Phillip Delaquess
  • Re: The Fifty United States ..., Logical Language Group
  • Re: The Fifty United States, etc., Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • No Subject, Brian L Gottlieb
• Re: The Fifty United States ..., Philip Delaquess
• Re: The Fifty United States, etc., Jorge Llambias
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • The Fifty United States, etc., Mark E. Shoulson
• gradu is broken, Nick NICHOLAS
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: gradu is broken, Jorge Llambias