Re: lu'a

[jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU]

I said:
> >{lu'a} requires a mass as its sumti

Lojbab says:

> Why?
>
> Here are the relevant cmavo list entries for the converters
>
> lu'a      LAhE     the individuals of
>     the members of the set/components of the mass; converts another
 description
>  type to individuals

Ok, I should have said: {lu'a} requires a mass or a set as its sumti.

It doesn't change my argument that {lu'a le selcku} is not a book but
a component of one. (I can't see what set would be called {le selcku},
but I can see what mass.)

Jorge