[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- Subject: Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 1994 13:03:58 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group)
- In-Reply-To: <199411111334.AA25924@nfs2.digex.net> from "i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk" at Nov 11, 94 12:55:18 pm
la .i,n. cusku di'e
> Well, we need some way of saying "two typical men". Does {lo'e re nanmu}
> work?
No, I don't think so: since "lo'e" belongs to the "lo"/"loi"/"lo'i" series,
inner quantifiers say how many members the set has.
I think you want "re nanmu cnano" or the like.
--
John Cowan sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.