Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus

[i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk]

cu'u la djan. kau,n.
> A note:  "re lo'e nanmu" doesn't mean "two typical men", it means "two
> instances of the abstraction called 'the typical man'" and is semantically
> unsound, since there is only one such objective abstraction.  (If it isn't
> objective, then "le'e" is wanted, and "re le'e nanmu" is fine.)

Well, we need some way of saying "two typical men".  Does {lo'e re nanmu}
work?

mu'o mi'e .i,n.